摘 要
言詞原則成爲現代法制社會刑事訴訟中通行的原則,主要是因其在保障法庭審理的對抗性的同時,既能體現訴訟程序的合理性又能保障案件事實真相之發現。我國修改後的刑訴法確立了具有明顯對抗色彩的“抗辯式”庭審方式,但立法上卻沒有確保這1庭審方式有效運作的.言詞原則,甚至立法和有關司法解釋中有些內容還嚴重背離了言詞原則的要求,不能滿足司法實踐中保障被告人質證權和發現案件事實真相的雙重需要。因此,確立言詞原則並對有關刑事訴訟法條文進行修改和補充,將對我國刑事訴訟的民主進程發揮積極的推動作用。
關鍵詞：言詞原則；保障；完善
ABSTRACT
The principle of verbalism that becomes worldwide practices principles of contemporary legal society is main based on that it can guarantee participants contesting on court trial, mean while, it also embody the procedure reasonableness as well as guarantee the case’s facts to be disclosed. The reviewed criminal procedure law of our country build an accusing-defending trial model that aiming at end chancing the participants contesting on court. But the law did not build the principle of verbalism that could guarantee the accusing-defending trial model to be operation efficiently, besides, some articles of legislation and judicial interpretation are deviate from the principle of verbalism is to say, the legisilation is no longer fully catch up with the double needness to guarantee the case’s facts. Therefore, to establish the principle verbalism and to mend or comlete the articles of our criminal procedure law can surely propel the democratic course of our criminal procedure actively.
Key words: the principle of verbalism; suggestion; perfection
..............................
注：【包括：畢業論文，任務書，開題報告】