摘 要
過錯責任原則的精神實質在於無過錯則無責任。嚴格責任原則的精神實質在於法律對危險性行爲責任的合理分配。在法律經濟學的視角下不同的侵權責任原則就意味着不同的效率和激勵。效率原則要求侵權責任的歸責原則應當能使預防成本、事故的損失成本以及社會成本的'總和降到最低。過錯責任原則與嚴格責任原則在經濟價值取向上的差異表現爲：過錯責任原則適合雙邊預防而嚴格責任原則適用於單邊預防。與過錯責任相比較，嚴格責任原則能更有效的起到預防作用和降低訴訟成本的作用。從經濟價值和民事歸責參考標準的角度出發，進而提出了完善過錯責任原則和嚴格責任原則在我國產品責任、動物致人損害責任中的具體措施：制定統1的《產品責任法》、明確產品銷售者的責任、區分不同動物的危險性並制定相應的歸責原則。
關鍵詞:嚴格責任原則；過錯責任原則；歸責原則；效率；參考標準;
具體措施
Abstract
The spiritual essence of fault responsibility principle is that faultless means irresponsibility The Spiritual essence of strict responsibility principle is that law distributes the responsibility of dangerous behavior reasonably. From the perspective of legal economics, different principles mean different efficiency and incentive. According to the principle of efficiency, tort liability principles ought to minimize the accidents costs including the prevention cost, the accident loss, as well as the social costs. The difference between fault responsibility principle and strict responsibility principle in the value of economy is that fault responsibility principle fits bilateral prevention, but strict responsibility principle fits unilateral prevention. Compared with fault responsibility principle, strict responsibility principle makes better use of prevention and reducing the costs of proceedings. From economic value and the reference standard angle of civil responsibility to embark，then proposes concrete measure of fault responsibility principle and strict responsibility principle in product liability and animal tort liability: Making a unified product liability law、Establishing the responsibility of the seller 、Differentiating the danger between different animals and lying down the appropriate rules.
Key words: Strict responsibility; Fault responsibility; Imputation principles; Efficiency; Reference standard; Concrete measure
..............................
注：【包括：畢業論文，任務書，開題報告】
